BRKW vs IVV
Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BRKW | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $15M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 22.81% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -5.49% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | -2.70% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
BRKW vs IVV Performance
Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BRKW returned -2.70% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, BRKW is down 5.49% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BRKW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.5% for BRKW and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.11. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BRKW charges 1.00% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BRKW currently yields 22.81% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BRKW and IVV share 1 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BRKW | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRK.B | 7.83% | 1.39% | 6.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BRKW or IVV?
BRKW has an expense ratio of 1.00% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BRKW or IVV?
Over the past year BRKW returned -2.70% vs +22.02% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BRKW annualized -3.52% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BRKW or IVV?
BRKW has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BRKW -14.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BRKW and IVV?
BRKW and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.11, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BRKW and IVV?
BRKW and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 1.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BRKW or IVV?
BRKW yields 22.81% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BRKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.