BSMW vs IVV
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. BSMW offers more diversification with 1,807 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSMW | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $216M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.27% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 1,807 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +0.27% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.42% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.15% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -7.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 1, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
BSMW vs IVV Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BSMW returned +4.42% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, BSMW is up 0.27% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, BSMW compounded at +3.15% per year against +21.81% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +2.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.3% for BSMW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.6% for BSMW and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSMW charges 0.18% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSMW currently yields 3.27% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BSMW and IVV share 0 holdings out of 1058 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSMW or IVV?
BSMW has an expense ratio of 0.18% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSMW or IVV?
Over the past year BSMW returned +4.42% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BSMW annualized +2.99% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSMW or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.3% for BSMW. Worst drawdown: BSMW -7.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BSMW and IVV?
BSMW and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSMW and IVV?
BSMW and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1058 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSMW or IVV?
BSMW yields 3.27% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BSMW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.