BSOL vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: TiedMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBSOLIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.20%0.03%
AUM$627M$865.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.09%
Holdings1508
YTD Return-40.29%+13.72%
1Y Return-+21.64%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.55%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.27%
Volatility (annualized)-15.1%
Max Drawdown-66.4%-56.5%
Fund FamilyBitwiseiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionOct 23, 2025May 15, 2000

BSOL vs IVV Performance

Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) is a ETF from Bitwise and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BSOL is down 40.29% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.4% for BSOL and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BSOL charges 0.20% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSOL currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BSOL or IVV?

BSOL has an expense ratio of 0.20% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.

Which pays a higher dividend, BSOL or IVV?

BSOL yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.