BSSX vs IVV
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSSX | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $131M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.29% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 1,365 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +0.65% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.58% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.53% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -7.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
BSSX vs IVV Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BSSX returned +5.58% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, BSSX is up 0.65% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Over three years, BSSX compounded at +4.53% per year against +21.55% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +4.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.7% for BSSX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.9% for BSSX and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSSX charges 0.18% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSSX currently yields 3.29% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BSSX and IVV share 0 holdings out of 957 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSSX or IVV?
BSSX has an expense ratio of 0.18% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSSX or IVV?
Over the past year BSSX returned +5.58% vs +21.64% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BSSX annualized +4.53% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSSX or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.7% for BSSX. Worst drawdown: BSSX -7.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BSSX and IVV?
BSSX and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSSX and IVV?
BSSX and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 957 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSSX or IVV?
BSSX yields 3.29% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BSSX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.