BSV vs VBK
Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, BSV or VBK?
Short Term Bond against Small Cap Growth.
BSV has a lower expense ratio. VBK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSV | VBK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.05% |
| AUM | $45.6B | $23.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.01% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 3,205 | 553 |
| YTD Return | +0.07% | +10.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.14% | +13.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.28% | +15.92%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.51% | +3.67%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.4%Best | 20.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.0%Best | -59.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,778 | $11,975Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Short Term Bond | Small Cap Growth |
| Inception | Apr 3, 2007 | Jan 26, 2004 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 10, 2007 to Sep 17, 2026 (19.4 years).
BSV vs VBK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BSV vs VBK Performance
Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSV returned +1.14% while VBK returned +13.31%. Year to date, BSV is up 0.07% versus a gain of 10.60% for VBK.
Over three years, BSV compounded at +4.28% per year against +15.92% for VBK; over five years the annualized figures are +1.51% and +3.67% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VBK has the edge at +8.61% annualized vs +0.89%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VBK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.4% compared with 2.4% for BSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.0% for BSV and -59.4% for VBK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.11. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSV charges 0.03% per year while VBK charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $5 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSV currently yields 4.01% against 0.44% for VBK.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.2% of VBK's money is in holdings BSV also owns.
Stated as a floor: for BSV, our book for it covers 63.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 1,013 positions we hold weights for in BSV and 542 in VBK, against full books of 3,205 and 553.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BSV | Weight in VBK | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HUBBHubbell Inc | 0.00% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSV and VBK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSV or VBK?
BSV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VBK charges 0.05%. BSV is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSV or VBK?
Over the past year BSV returned +1.14% vs +13.31% for VBK, so VBK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), BSV annualized +0.89% vs +8.61% for VBK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSV or VBK?
VBK has been the more volatile fund at 20.4% annualized versus 2.4% for BSV. Worst drawdown: BSV -9.0% vs VBK -59.4%.
Should I hold both BSV and VBK?
BSV and VBK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.11, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSV or VBK?
BSV yields 4.01% while VBK yields 0.44%, so BSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VBK better than BSV?
BSV has a lower expense ratio. VBK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.