BSV vs VGK

BSV vs VGK

Which is better, BSV or VGK?

Short Term Bond against Large Cap Blend.

BSV has a lower expense ratio. VGK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: BSVHigher Returns: VGK

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBSVVGK
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.06%
AUM$45.6B$38.5B
Dividend Yield4.01%2.81%
Holdings3,2051,240
YTD Return-0.08%+6.23%Best
1Y Return+1.05%+14.06%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+4.27%+17.50%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+1.47%+9.32%Best
Volatility (annualized)2.4%Best19.2%
Max Drawdown-9.0%Best-67.3%
$10,000 over 5 years$10,757$15,613Best
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleShort Term BondLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 3, 2007Mar 4, 2005

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 10, 2007 to Sep 18, 2026 (19.4 years).

BSV vs VGK growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.4 years both funds cover.

Compare BSV against instead:BSV vs SPYBSV vs QQQBSV vs VOOBSV vs VTIVGK against:VGK vs VXUS

BSV vs VGK Performance

Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF (VGK) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSV returned +1.05% while VGK returned +14.06%. Year to date, BSV is down 0.08% versus a gain of 6.23% for VGK.

Over three years, BSV compounded at +4.27% per year against +17.50% for VGK; over five years the annualized figures are +1.47% and +9.32% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VGK has the edge at +1.92% annualized vs +0.88%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VGK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 2.4% for BSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.0% for BSV and -67.3% for VGK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.25. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BSV charges 0.03% per year while VGK charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $6 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSV currently yields 4.01% against 2.81% for VGK.

Holdings Overlap

VGK already in BSV2.6%

At least 2.6% of VGK's money is in holdings BSV also owns.

Stated as a floor: for BSV, our book for it covers 63.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

VGK and BSV share little of their money.

3 positions in common, counted across the 1,013 positions we hold weights for in BSV and 1,101 in VGK, against full books of 3,205 and 1,240.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BSVWeight in VGKDifference
CURVVanguard Market Liquidity Fund0.70%0.71%0.01%
SAN:MABanco Santander, S.A Sponsored Adr - Sponsored (1 Ads : 1 Ordinary)0.01%1.27%1.26%
BARC:LNBarclays Plc0.01%0.58%0.57%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BSV and VGK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BSVVGK

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BSV or VGK?

BSV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VGK charges 0.06%. BSV is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BSV or VGK?

Over the past year BSV returned +1.05% vs +14.06% for VGK, so VGK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), BSV annualized +0.88% vs +1.92% for VGK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BSV or VGK?

VGK has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 2.4% for BSV. Worst drawdown: BSV -9.0% vs VGK -67.3%.

Should I hold both BSV and VGK?

BSV and VGK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.25, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between BSV and VGK?

At least 2.6% of VGK's money is in holdings BSV also owns. Our book for BSV is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 1,013 positions we hold weights for in BSV and 1,101 in VGK.

Which pays a higher dividend, BSV or VGK?

BSV yields 4.01% while VGK yields 2.81%, so BSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VGK better than BSV?

BSV has a lower expense ratio. VGK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.