BSV vs VWIUX

BSV vs VWIUX

Which is better, BSV or VWIUX?

Short Term Bond against Municipal Bond.

BSV has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: BSV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBSVVWIUX
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.09%
AUM$45.6B$86.4B
Dividend Yield4.01%3.13%
Holdings3,20516,181
YTD Price Return-2.01%-2.61%
1Y Price Return-1.92%-0.07%
3Y Price Return (annualized)+0.85%+0.30%
5Y Price Return (annualized)-1.24%-1.94%
Volatility (annualized)2.9%Best5.3%
Max Drawdown-9.9%Best-15.9%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeTax Preferred
StyleShort Term BondMunicipal Bond
InceptionApr 3, 2007Feb 12, 2001

Not shown on this pair: $10,000 over 5 years, Top 10 Weight.

A price return is not the return of a fund that pays its income out. The coupon or distribution never appears in the price, so the return rows carry no winner here. BSV currently yields 4.01% and VWIUX 3.13%.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 7, 2021 to Sep 2, 2026 (5 years).

Compare BSV against instead:BSV vs SPYBSV vs QQQBSV vs VOOBSV vs VTIVWIUX against:VWIUX vs VXUS

BSV vs VWIUX Performance

Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Intermediate Term Tax-Exempt Fund admiral class (VWIUX) is a mutual fund from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSV's price moved -1.92% and VWIUX's -0.07%, before the income each one paid out.

Over three years, BSV compounded at +0.85% per year against +0.30% for VWIUX; over five years the annualized figures are -1.24% and -1.94% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VWIUX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.3% compared with 2.9% for BSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.9% for BSV and -15.9% for VWIUX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BSV charges 0.03% per year while VWIUX charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $9 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSV currently yields 4.01% against 3.13% for VWIUX.

Structure and taxes

VWIUX is a mutual fund and BSV is an ETF. A mutual fund prices once a day at net asset value and may carry a purchase minimum. An ETF trades through the day at whatever the market pays for it.

In a taxable account the difference that usually matters is distributions. An ETF can meet redemptions in kind, so it rarely has to sell holdings and rarely passes a capital gain to the people who held it; a mutual fund that sells holdings to meet redemptions can distribute a realised gain at year end to everyone still in the fund, whether or not they sold anything themselves. In a tax-deferred account that difference largely disappears. Both are descriptions of how the two wrappers work, not a recommendation.

Tax-loss harvesting works on either wrapper.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 558 holdings in BSV and 1,763 in VWIUX, totalling 16.0% and 20.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

The two holdings books were reported 150 days apart, BSV as of Jun 30, 2026 and VWIUX as of Jan 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

0 positions in common, counted across the 558 positions we hold weights for in BSV and 1,763 in VWIUX, against full books of 3,205 and 16,181.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BSV and VWIUX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BSVVWIUX

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BSV or VWIUX?

BSV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VWIUX charges 0.09%. BSV is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which is riskier, BSV or VWIUX?

VWIUX has been the more volatile fund at 5.3% annualized versus 2.9% for BSV. Worst drawdown: BSV -9.9% vs VWIUX -15.9%.

Should I hold both BSV and VWIUX?

BSV and VWIUX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BSV or VWIUX?

BSV yields 4.01% while VWIUX yields 3.13%, so BSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is it better to hold VWIUX or BSV in a taxable account?

BSV is an ETF and VWIUX is a mutual fund. An ETF can meet redemptions in kind, so it rarely distributes a capital gain to the people holding it. A mutual fund that sells holdings to meet redemptions can pass a realised gain to every holder at year end. In a tax-deferred account that difference largely disappears. This is information, not a recommendation.

Is VWIUX better than BSV?

BSV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.