BUFH vs VTI
FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUFH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $57M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 13 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +3.41% | +14.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.09% | +23.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
BUFH vs VTI Performance
FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BUFH returned +6.09% while VTI returned +23.62%. Year to date, BUFH is up 3.41% versus a gain of 14.16% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 1.8% for BUFH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.5% for BUFH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUFH charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFH currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BUFH and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2795 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUFH or VTI?
BUFH has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BUFH or VTI?
Over the past year BUFH returned +6.09% vs +23.62% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BUFH annualized +6.53% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BUFH or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 1.8% for BUFH. Worst drawdown: BUFH -1.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BUFH and VTI?
BUFH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between BUFH and VTI?
BUFH and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2795 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUFH or VTI?
BUFH yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.