BUFQ vs SPY
FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 503 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUFQ | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $789.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +10.33% | +13.75% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.14% | +22.91% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.32% | +21.67% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.32% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 15, 2022 | Jan 22, 1993 |
BUFQ vs SPY Performance
FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year BUFQ returned +16.14% while SPY returned +22.91%. Year to date, BUFQ is up 10.33% versus a gain of 13.75% for SPY.
Over three years, BUFQ compounded at +16.32% per year against +21.67% for SPY. Across the full 4-year window we track, BUFQ has the edge at +18.14% annualized vs +8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 11.6% for BUFQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for BUFQ and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUFQ charges 1.00% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $9 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFQ currently yields 0.00% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
BUFQ and SPY share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUFQ or SPY?
BUFQ has an expense ratio of 1.00% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BUFQ or SPY?
Over the past year BUFQ returned +16.14% vs +22.91% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BUFQ annualized +18.14% vs +8.85% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BUFQ or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 11.6% for BUFQ. Worst drawdown: BUFQ -15.7% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both BUFQ and SPY?
BUFQ and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BUFQ and SPY?
BUFQ and SPY share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUFQ or SPY?
BUFQ yields 0.00% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.