BWG vs IVV
BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund Inc vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BWG or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BWG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.66% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $141M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 11.37% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 102 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -3.06% | +11.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | -4.38% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.00% | +20.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.08% | +12.80%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,552 | $18,262Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 28, 2012 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 28, 2012 to Sep 10, 2026 (14.5 years).
BWG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BWG vs IVV Performance
BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund Inc (BWG) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BWG returned -4.38% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, BWG is down 3.06% versus a gain of 11.57% for IVV.
Over three years, BWG compounded at +10.00% per year against +20.71% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +1.08% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.98% annualized vs -2.47%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BWG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 14.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for BWG and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BWG charges 2.66% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $266 vs $3 annually, a gap of $263 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BWG currently yields 11.37% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 57 holdings in BWG and 505 in IVV, totalling 57.2% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 57 positions we hold weights for in BWG and 505 in IVV, against full books of 102 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BWG and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BWG or IVV?
BWG has an expense ratio of 2.66% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $263 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BWG or IVV?
Over the past year BWG returned -4.38% vs +17.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), BWG annualized -2.47% vs +12.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BWG or IVV?
BWG has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 14.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BWG -58.8% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both BWG and IVV?
BWG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BWG or IVV?
BWG yields 11.37% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BWG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BWG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.