BWZ vs SCHD
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, BWZ or SCHD?
Short Term Mid Quality against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BWZ | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $290M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.08% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 291 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +1.67% | +24.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.55% | +28.14%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.51% | +15.58%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.16% | +9.90%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.9%Best | 13.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.0% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,433 | $16,032Best |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Short Term Mid Quality | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jan 15, 2009 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Sep 10, 2026 (14.9 years).
BWZ vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BWZ vs SCHD Performance
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year BWZ returned +0.55% while SCHD returned +28.14%. Year to date, BWZ is up 1.67% versus a gain of 24.59% for SCHD.
Over three years, BWZ compounded at +3.51% per year against +15.58% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are -1.16% and +9.90% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.34% annualized vs -1.56%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 6.9% for BWZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.0% for BWZ and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BWZ charges 0.35% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $6 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BWZ currently yields 2.08% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 7 holdings in BWZ and 100 in SCHD, totalling 2.4% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 7 positions we hold weights for in BWZ and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 291 and 103.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BWZ and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BWZ or SCHD?
BWZ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BWZ or SCHD?
Over the past year BWZ returned +0.55% vs +28.14% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), BWZ annualized -1.56% vs +11.34% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BWZ or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 6.9% for BWZ. Worst drawdown: BWZ -37.0% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both BWZ and SCHD?
BWZ and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BWZ or SCHD?
BWZ yields 2.08% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than BWZ?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.