CBXA vs SCHD
Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CBXA | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $4M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.46% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | -16.07% | +27.93% | |
| 1Y Return | -20.67% | +30.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Calamos Investments | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
CBXA vs SCHD Performance
Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBXA) is a ETF from Calamos Investments and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year CBXA returned -20.67% while SCHD returned +30.06%. Year to date, CBXA is down 16.07% versus a gain of 27.93% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CBXA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for CBXA and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.12. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CBXA charges 0.69% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $6 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CBXA currently yields 2.46% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CBXA or SCHD?
CBXA has an expense ratio of 0.69% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CBXA or SCHD?
Over the past year CBXA returned -20.67% vs +30.06% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CBXA annualized -4.81% vs +11.56% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CBXA or SCHD?
CBXA has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: CBXA -29.7% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both CBXA and SCHD?
CBXA and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.12, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, CBXA or SCHD?
CBXA yields 2.46% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.