CCEF vs VTI
Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCEF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.19% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $35M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.03% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +9.03% | +13.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.70% | +21.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Calamos Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 16, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
CCEF vs VTI Performance
Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) is a ETF from Calamos Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CCEF returned +13.70% while VTI returned +21.12%. Year to date, CCEF is up 9.03% versus a gain of 13.38% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 9.5% for CCEF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.1% for CCEF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCEF charges 3.19% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $319 vs $3 annually, a gap of $316 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCEF currently yields 8.03% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CCEF and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2843 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCEF or VTI?
CCEF has an expense ratio of 3.19% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $316 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CCEF or VTI?
Over the past year CCEF returned +13.70% vs +21.12% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), CCEF annualized +15.44% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CCEF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 9.5% for CCEF. Worst drawdown: CCEF -14.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CCEF and VTI?
CCEF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CCEF and VTI?
CCEF and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2843 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCEF or VTI?
CCEF yields 8.03% while VTI yields 1.07%, so CCEF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.