CELT vs IVV
Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CELT | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -25.88% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -71.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 7, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
CELT vs IVV Performance
Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) is a ETF from Tradr ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, CELT is down 25.88% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -71.0% for CELT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CELT charges 1.30% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $3 annually, a gap of $127 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CELT currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CELT or IVV?
CELT has an expense ratio of 1.30% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $127 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, CELT or IVV?
CELT yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.