CGW vs FMO

CGW vs FMO
See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free

Quick Verdict

CGW offers more diversification with 82 holdings.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: TiedMore Diversified: CGW

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCGWFMOWinner
Expense Ratio0.58%-
AUM$1.1B-
Dividend Yield1.54%-
Holdings820
YTD Return+2.86%-
1Y Return+2.90%-
3Y Return (annualized)+10.68%-
5Y Return (annualized)+3.54%-
Volatility (annualized)17.3%-
Max Drawdown-57.2%-
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Fiduciary/Claymore Energy Infrastructure Fund
CategoryEquity-
InceptionMay 14, 2007-

CGW vs FMO Performance

Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Fiduciary/Claymore Energy Infrastructure Fund (FMO) is a ETF from Fiduciary/Claymore Energy Infrastructure Fund.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

Frequently Asked Questions

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free