CIFU vs QQQ
T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, CIFU or QQQ?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CIFU | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $10M | $437.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 8 | 208 |
| YTD Return | -95.05% | +12.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | -94.49% | +11.59%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.74% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 162.0% | 23.1%Best |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 21, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CIFU vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CIFU vs QQQ Performance
T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) is an ETF from REX Shares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CIFU returned -94.49% while QQQ returned +11.59%. Year to date, CIFU is down 95.05% versus a gain of 12.98% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CIFU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 162.0% compared with 23.1% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CIFU charges 1.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $18 annually, a gap of $132 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CIFU currently yields 0.00% against 0.43% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in CIFU and 101 in QQQ, totalling 6.3% and 99.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in CIFU and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 8 and 208.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CIFU and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CIFU or QQQ?
CIFU has an expense ratio of 1.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $132 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CIFU or QQQ?
Over the past year CIFU returned -94.49% vs +11.59% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CIFU or QQQ?
CIFU has been the more volatile fund at 162.0% annualized versus 23.1% for QQQ.
Should I hold both CIFU and QQQ?
CIFU and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CIFU or QQQ?
CIFU yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than CIFU?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.