CLSX vs IVV
Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CLSX or IVV?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CLSX | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.46% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $14M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 6 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -23.36% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | -61.55% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 196.9% | 13.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -93.2% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $5,396 | $11,695Best |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1 years).
CLSX vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
CLSX vs IVV Performance
Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CLSX returned -61.55% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, CLSX is down 23.36% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CLSX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 196.9% compared with 13.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -93.2% for CLSX and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CLSX charges 1.46% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $146 vs $3 annually, a gap of $143 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLSX currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CLSX and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CLSX or IVV?
CLSX has an expense ratio of 1.46% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $143 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CLSX or IVV?
Over the past year CLSX returned -61.55% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CLSX annualized -46.04% vs +16.95% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CLSX or IVV?
CLSX has been the more volatile fund at 196.9% annualized versus 13.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CLSX -93.2% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both CLSX and IVV?
CLSX and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CLSX or IVV?
CLSX yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than CLSX?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.