COAL vs IVV
Range Global Coal Index ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, COAL or IVV?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. COAL led over 1Y, IVV over the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COAL | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $59M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.16% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 35 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +15.76%Best | +12.51% |
| 1Y Return | +35.74%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.1% | 12.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -43.3% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $10,982 | $16,162Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.3% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Range ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 10, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 24, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (2.6 years).
COAL vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
COAL vs IVV Performance
Range Global Coal Index ETF (COAL) is an ETF from Range ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year COAL returned +35.74% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, COAL is up 15.76% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
COAL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.1% compared with 12.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.3% for COAL and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.10. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COAL charges 0.85% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COAL currently yields 2.16% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 30 holdings in COAL and 505 in IVV, totalling 98.8% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in COAL and 505 in IVV, against full books of 35 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 495 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for COAL (99.3% of the fund), and 10 for COAL that do not appear in IVV (46.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of COAL and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COAL or IVV?
COAL has an expense ratio of 0.85% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, COAL or IVV?
Over the past year COAL returned +35.74% vs +17.57% for IVV, so COAL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, COAL or IVV?
COAL has been the more volatile fund at 28.1% annualized versus 12.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: COAL -43.3% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both COAL and IVV?
COAL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.10, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, COAL or IVV?
COAL yields 2.16% while IVV yields 1.06%, so COAL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than COAL?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. COAL led over 1Y, IVV over the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.