CONI vs QQQ
GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, CONI or QQQ?
Trading-Inverse Equity against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CONI | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.15% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $14M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.08% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 2 | 107 |
| YTD Return | -52.37% | +17.21%Best |
| 1Y Return | -38.06% | +22.10%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.60% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 107.4% | 18.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -95.4% | -22.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $621 | $15,608Best |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 3, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 4, 2024 to Sep 17, 2026 (2 years).
CONI vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
CONI vs QQQ Performance
GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF (CONI) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CONI returned -38.06% while QQQ returned +22.10%. Year to date, CONI is down 52.37% versus a gain of 17.21% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CONI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 107.4% compared with 18.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -95.4% for CONI and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.49. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CONI charges 1.15% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $18 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CONI currently yields 2.08% against 0.44% for QQQ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CONI and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CONI or QQQ?
CONI has an expense ratio of 1.15% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CONI or QQQ?
Over the past year CONI returned -38.06% vs +22.10% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CONI annualized -75.08% vs +24.93% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CONI or QQQ?
CONI has been the more volatile fund at 107.4% annualized versus 18.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: CONI -95.4% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both CONI and QQQ?
CONI and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.49, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CONI or QQQ?
CONI yields 2.08% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so CONI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than CONI?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.