CONX vs IVV
Direxion Daily COIN Bull 2X ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CONX or IVV?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CONX | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $6M | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.29% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 16 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -66.43% | +14.90%Best |
| 1Y Return | -73.03% | +17.30%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.97% |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 19, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CONX vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CONX vs IVV Performance
Direxion Daily COIN Bull 2X ETF (CONX) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CONX returned -73.03% while IVV returned +17.30%. Year to date, CONX is down 66.43% versus a gain of 14.90% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CONX charges 0.97% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $3 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CONX currently yields 2.29% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings CONX also owns.
Stated as a floor: for CONX, our book for it covers 69.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in CONX and 505 in IVV, against full books of 16 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CONX | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| COINCoinbase Globa-A | 16.29% | 0.06% | 16.23% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CONX and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CONX or IVV?
CONX has an expense ratio of 0.97% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $94 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CONX or IVV?
Over the past year CONX returned -73.03% vs +17.30% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CONX or IVV?
CONX yields 2.29% while IVV yields 1.06%, so CONX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than CONX?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.