COPA vs IVV
Themes Copper Miners ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. COPA delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COPA | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $13M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.84% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 59 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +20.99% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +86.58% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Themes ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 23, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
COPA vs IVV Performance
Themes Copper Miners ETF (COPA) is a ETF from Themes ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year COPA returned +86.58% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, COPA is up 20.99% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
COPA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.7% for COPA and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COPA charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COPA currently yields 3.84% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
COPA and IVV share 1 holdings out of 555 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in COPA | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FCX | 8.57% | 0.14% | 8.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COPA or IVV?
COPA has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, COPA or IVV?
Over the past year COPA returned +86.58% vs +21.79% for IVV, so COPA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), COPA annualized +47.61% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, COPA or IVV?
COPA has been the more volatile fund at 33.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: COPA -34.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both COPA and IVV?
COPA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between COPA and IVV?
COPA and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 555 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, COPA or IVV?
COPA yields 3.84% while IVV yields 1.10%, so COPA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.