COPP vs VYM
Sprott Copper Miners ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. COPP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COPP | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $262M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.14% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 62 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +21.10% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +95.23% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -43.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 5, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
COPP vs VYM Performance
Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) is a ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year COPP returned +95.23% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, COPP is up 21.10% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
COPP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.1% for COPP and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COPP charges 0.65% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $4 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COPP currently yields 2.14% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
COPP and VYM share 1 holdings out of 618 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in COPP | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCCO | 5.13% | 0.08% | 5.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COPP or VYM?
COPP has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, COPP or VYM?
Over the past year COPP returned +95.23% vs +26.12% for VYM, so COPP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), COPP annualized +40.61% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, COPP or VYM?
COPP has been the more volatile fund at 30.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: COPP -43.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both COPP and VYM?
COPP and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between COPP and VYM?
COPP and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 618 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, COPP or VYM?
COPP yields 2.14% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.