CORD vs SCHD
T-REX 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, CORD or SCHD?
Trading-Inverse Equity against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CORD | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $22M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 5 | 103 |
| YTD Return | -90.47% | +21.99%Best |
| 1Y Return | -89.19% | +25.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.48% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 217.9% | 14.3%Best |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 26, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CORD vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CORD vs SCHD Performance
T-REX 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD) is an ETF from REX Shares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year CORD returned -89.19% while SCHD returned +25.92%. Year to date, CORD is down 90.47% versus a gain of 21.99% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CORD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 217.9% compared with 14.3% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.04. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CORD charges 1.50% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $6 annually, a gap of $144 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CORD currently yields 0.00% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in CORD and 100 in SCHD, totalling 5.8% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in CORD and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 5 and 103.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CORD and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CORD or SCHD?
CORD has an expense ratio of 1.50% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $144 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CORD or SCHD?
Over the past year CORD returned -89.19% vs +25.92% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CORD or SCHD?
CORD has been the more volatile fund at 217.9% annualized versus 14.3% for SCHD.
Should I hold both CORD and SCHD?
CORD and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.04, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CORD or SCHD?
CORD yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than CORD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.