CORO vs QQQ
iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. CORO delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CORO | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $7.7B | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.71% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 40 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +17.53% | +17.46% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.30% | +26.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CORO vs QQQ Performance
iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF (CORO) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CORO returned +32.30% while QQQ returned +26.02%. Year to date, CORO is up 17.53% versus a gain of 17.46% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 11.9% for CORO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.1% for CORO and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CORO charges 0.55% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $18 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CORO currently yields 2.71% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CORO and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 132 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CORO | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:AS | 1.06% | 0.70% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CORO or QQQ?
CORO has an expense ratio of 0.55% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CORO or QQQ?
Over the past year CORO returned +32.30% vs +26.02% for QQQ, so CORO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CORO annualized +30.69% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CORO or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 11.9% for CORO. Worst drawdown: CORO -14.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CORO and QQQ?
CORO and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CORO and QQQ?
CORO and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 132 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CORO or QQQ?
CORO yields 2.71% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so CORO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.