CPSL vs VTI
Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CPSL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $124M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 14 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +3.64% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.23% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.4% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -3.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Calamos Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 9, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
CPSL vs VTI Performance
Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF (CPSL) is a ETF from Calamos Investments and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CPSL returned +6.23% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, CPSL is up 3.64% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 2.4% for CPSL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.7% for CPSL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CPSL charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CPSL currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CPSL and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2795 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CPSL or VTI?
CPSL has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CPSL or VTI?
Over the past year CPSL returned +6.23% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CPSL annualized +6.60% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CPSL or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 2.4% for CPSL. Worst drawdown: CPSL -3.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CPSL and VTI?
CPSL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between CPSL and VTI?
CPSL and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2795 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CPSL or VTI?
CPSL yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.