CRDT vs SCHD
Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRDT | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $36M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.95% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +5.32% | +26.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.77% | +30.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.55% | +16.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.7% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.8% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Simplify Exchange Traded Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 26, 2023 | Oct 20, 2011 |
CRDT vs SCHD Performance
Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) is a ETF from Simplify Exchange Traded Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year CRDT returned +4.77% while SCHD returned +30.90%. Year to date, CRDT is up 5.32% versus a gain of 26.54% for SCHD.
Over three years, CRDT compounded at +4.55% per year against +16.29% for SCHD. Across the full 3-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.51% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 5.7% for CRDT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.8% for CRDT and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRDT charges 0.99% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $6 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRDT currently yields 5.95% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
CRDT and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 117 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRDT or SCHD?
CRDT has an expense ratio of 0.99% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $93 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CRDT or SCHD?
Over the past year CRDT returned +4.77% vs +30.90% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), CRDT annualized +4.83% vs +11.51% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CRDT or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 5.7% for CRDT. Worst drawdown: CRDT -9.8% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both CRDT and SCHD?
CRDT and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CRDT and SCHD?
CRDT and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 117 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRDT or SCHD?
CRDT yields 5.95% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so CRDT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.