CRSH vs QQQ
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRSH | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $16M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 84.49% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 35 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +8.48% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | -8.67% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 41.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -61.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 1, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CRSH vs QQQ Performance
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CRSH returned -8.67% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, CRSH is up 8.48% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRSH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 41.5% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -61.5% for CRSH and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRSH charges 1.05% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $18 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRSH currently yields 84.49% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CRSH and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 105 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRSH or QQQ?
CRSH has an expense ratio of 1.05% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CRSH or QQQ?
Over the past year CRSH returned -8.67% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CRSH annualized -26.80% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CRSH or QQQ?
CRSH has been the more volatile fund at 41.5% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: CRSH -61.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CRSH and QQQ?
CRSH and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CRSH and QQQ?
CRSH and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 105 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRSH or QQQ?
CRSH yields 84.49% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so CRSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.