CRWG vs VYM
Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRWG | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.77% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $197M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.39% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | -40.57% | +15.34% | |
| 1Y Return | -67.87% | +23.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.22% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 175.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -94.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 11, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
CRWG vs VYM Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) is a ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CRWG returned -67.87% while VYM returned +23.24%. Year to date, CRWG is down 40.57% versus a gain of 15.34% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRWG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 175.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.0% for CRWG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRWG charges 0.77% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $77 vs $4 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRWG currently yields 1.39% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
CRWG and VYM share 0 holdings out of 604 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRWG or VYM?
CRWG has an expense ratio of 0.77% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $73 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CRWG or VYM?
Over the past year CRWG returned -67.87% vs +23.24% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CRWG annualized -87.15% vs +7.04% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CRWG or VYM?
CRWG has been the more volatile fund at 175.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CRWG -94.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both CRWG and VYM?
CRWG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CRWG and VYM?
CRWG and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 604 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRWG or VYM?
CRWG yields 1.39% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.