DBEM vs IVV
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. DBEM offers more diversification with 1,175 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DBEM | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $109M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.31% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 1,175 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +18.68% | +12.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.25% | +20.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.10% | +22.10% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.76% | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 9, 2011 | May 15, 2000 |
DBEM vs IVV Performance
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DBEM returned +36.25% while IVV returned +20.70%. Year to date, DBEM is up 18.68% versus a gain of 12.96% for IVV.
Over three years, DBEM compounded at +23.10% per year against +22.10% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.76% and +13.40% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.01% annualized vs +3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DBEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.7% for DBEM and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DBEM charges 0.66% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DBEM currently yields 2.31% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DBEM and IVV share 1 holdings out of 1658 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DBEM | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAL | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DBEM or IVV?
DBEM has an expense ratio of 0.66% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DBEM or IVV?
Over the past year DBEM returned +36.25% vs +20.70% for IVV, so DBEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), DBEM annualized +3.65% vs +7.01% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DBEM or IVV?
DBEM has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DBEM -51.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DBEM and IVV?
DBEM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DBEM and IVV?
DBEM and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1658 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DBEM or IVV?
DBEM yields 2.31% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DBEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.