DDTN vs QQQ
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, DDTN or QQQ?
Option Writing against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DDTN led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DDTN | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $34M | $437.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 21 | 208 |
| YTD Return | +7.38%Best | +7.37% |
| 1Y Return | +9.25%Best | +7.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.44% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.19% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8%Best | 23.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -5.4%Best | -14.8% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $10,844Best | $10,426 |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 3, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 3, 2025 to Nov 6, 2026 (1 years).
DDTN vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
DDTN vs QQQ Performance
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November (DDTN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DDTN returned +9.25% while QQQ returned +7.77%. Year to date, DDTN is up 7.38% versus a gain of 7.37% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.9% compared with 7.8% for DDTN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.4% for DDTN and -14.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DDTN charges 0.79% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $18 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DDTN currently yields 0.00% against 0.43% for QQQ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DDTN and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DDTN or QQQ?
DDTN has an expense ratio of 0.79% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DDTN or QQQ?
Over the past year DDTN returned +9.25% vs +7.77% for QQQ, so DDTN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), DDTN annualized +8.44% vs +4.26% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DDTN or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 23.9% annualized versus 7.8% for DDTN. Worst drawdown: DDTN -5.4% vs QQQ -14.8%.
Should I hold both DDTN and QQQ?
DDTN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DDTN or QQQ?
DDTN yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than DDTN?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DDTN led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.