DECM vs FTLS

DECM vs FTLS

Which is better, DECM or FTLS?

FTLS has been ahead.

DECM has a lower expense ratio. FTLS led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: DECMHigher Returns: FTLS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDECMFTLS
Expense Ratio0.85%Best1.38%
AUM$35M$2.7B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.87%
Holdings10363
YTD Return+4.70%+9.83%Best
1Y Return+6.60%+13.43%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+14.42%
5Y Return (annualized)-+10.59%
Volatility (annualized)2.5%Best6.4%
Max Drawdown-3.0%Best-11.7%
$10,000 over 1.8 years$11,155$11,839Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionDec 20, 2024Sep 8, 2014

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 23, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).

DECM vs FTLS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.

Compare DECM against instead:DECM vs SPYDECM vs QQQDECM vs VOODECM vs VTIFTLS against:FTLS vs VXUS

DECM vs FTLS Performance

FT Vest US Equity Max Buffer ETF - December (DECM) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year DECM returned +6.60% while FTLS returned +13.43%. Year to date, DECM is up 4.70% versus a gain of 9.83% for FTLS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FTLS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.4% compared with 2.5% for DECM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.0% for DECM and -11.7% for FTLS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DECM charges 0.85% per year while FTLS charges 1.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $138 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DECM currently yields 0.00% against 0.87% for FTLS.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of DECM and FTLS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

DECMFTLS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DECM or FTLS?

DECM has an expense ratio of 0.85% while FTLS charges 1.38%. DECM is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, DECM or FTLS?

Over the past year DECM returned +6.60% vs +13.43% for FTLS, so FTLS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DECM annualized +6.26% vs +9.83% for FTLS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, DECM or FTLS?

FTLS has been the more volatile fund at 6.4% annualized versus 2.5% for DECM. Worst drawdown: DECM -3.0% vs FTLS -11.7%.

Should I hold both DECM and FTLS?

DECM and FTLS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, DECM or FTLS?

DECM yields 0.00% while FTLS yields 0.87%, so FTLS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is FTLS better than DECM?

DECM has a lower expense ratio. FTLS led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.