DECM vs GJUN
FT Vest US Equity Max Buffer ETF - December vs FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June
Which is better, DECM or GJUN?
GJUN has been ahead.
GJUN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DECM | GJUN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Tie | 0.85%Tie |
| AUM | $35M | $511M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +4.70% | +6.43%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.60% | +8.70%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.00% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.5%Best | 5.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -3.0%Best | -11.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $11,155 | $11,620Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2024 | Jun 16, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 23, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
DECM vs GJUN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
DECM vs GJUN Performance
FT Vest US Equity Max Buffer ETF - December (DECM) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year DECM returned +6.60% while GJUN returned +8.70%. Year to date, DECM is up 4.70% versus a gain of 6.43% for GJUN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GJUN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.4% compared with 2.5% for DECM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.0% for DECM and -11.0% for GJUN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DECM charges 0.85% per year while GJUN charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, DECM currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for GJUN.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DECM and GJUN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DECM or GJUN?
DECM has an expense ratio of 0.85% while GJUN charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, DECM or GJUN?
Over the past year DECM returned +6.60% vs +8.70% for GJUN, so GJUN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DECM annualized +6.26% vs +8.70% for GJUN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DECM or GJUN?
GJUN has been the more volatile fund at 5.4% annualized versus 2.5% for DECM. Worst drawdown: DECM -3.0% vs GJUN -11.0%.
Should I hold both DECM and GJUN?
DECM and GJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DECM or GJUN?
DECM yields 0.00% while GJUN yields 0.00%, so GJUN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GJUN better than DECM?
GJUN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.