DEEP vs IVV
DEEP vs IVV
Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DEEP delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DEEP | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $28M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.91% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +23.84% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.05% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.40% | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.25% | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Acquirers Funds, LLC | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 23, 2014 | May 15, 2000 |
DEEP vs IVV Performance
Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF (DEEP) is a ETF from Acquirers Funds, LLC and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DEEP returned +34.05% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, DEEP is up 23.84% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, DEEP compounded at +9.40% per year against +21.49% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.25% and +13.43% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +5.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DEEP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.4% for DEEP and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DEEP charges 0.80% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DEEP currently yields 1.91% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DEEP and IVV share 0 holdings out of 607 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DEEP or IVV?
DEEP has an expense ratio of 0.80% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DEEP or IVV?
Over the past year DEEP returned +34.05% vs +23.70% for IVV, so DEEP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), DEEP annualized +5.73% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DEEP or IVV?
DEEP has been the more volatile fund at 22.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DEEP -56.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DEEP and IVV?
DEEP and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DEEP and IVV?
DEEP and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 607 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DEEP or IVV?
DEEP yields 1.91% while IVV yields 1.09%, so DEEP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.