DFEB vs XFEB
FT Vest US Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February vs FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - February
Which is better, DFEB or XFEB?
DFEB has been ahead.
DFEB led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DFEB | XFEB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Tie | 0.85%Tie |
| AUM | $448M | $59M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +9.08%Best | +7.59% |
| 1Y Return | +12.16%Best | +9.97% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.81% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.59% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.3% | 4.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.3%Best | -9.1% |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $13,633Best | $12,794 |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Feb 21, 2020 | Feb 20, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 20, 2024 to Oct 13, 2026 (2.6 years).
DFEB vs XFEB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
DFEB vs XFEB Performance
FT Vest US Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February (DFEB) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - February (XFEB) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year DFEB returned +12.16% while XFEB returned +9.97%. Year to date, DFEB is up 9.08% versus a gain of 7.59% for XFEB.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DFEB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.3% compared with 4.4% for XFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.3% for DFEB and -9.1% for XFEB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DFEB charges 0.85% per year while XFEB charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, DFEB currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for XFEB.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DFEB and XFEB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DFEB or XFEB?
DFEB has an expense ratio of 0.85% while XFEB charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, DFEB or XFEB?
Over the past year DFEB returned +12.16% vs +9.97% for XFEB, so DFEB leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DFEB or XFEB?
DFEB has been the more volatile fund at 5.3% annualized versus 4.4% for XFEB. Worst drawdown: DFEB -8.3% vs XFEB -9.1%.
Should I hold both DFEB and XFEB?
DFEB and XFEB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DFEB or XFEB?
DFEB yields 0.00% while XFEB yields 0.00%, so XFEB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XFEB better than DFEB?
DFEB led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.