DISK vs QQQ

DISK vs QQQ

Which is better, DISK or QQQ?

QQQ costs less.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDISKQQQ
Expense Ratio0.75%0.18%Best
AUM$95M$483.5B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.44%
Holdings17107
YTD Return-21.47%+17.95%Best
1Y Return-+21.77%
3Y Return (annualized)-+25.63%
5Y Return (annualized)-+15.24%
Fund FamilyTema Global LimitedInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJun 30, 2026Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

DISK vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

DISK vs QQQ Performance

Tema Memory ETF (DISK) is an ETF from Tema Global Limited and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, DISK is down 21.47% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DISK charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DISK currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in DISK6.9%

At least 6.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings DISK also owns.

Stated as a floor: for DISK, our book for it covers 91.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

QQQ and DISK share little of their money.

4 positions in common, counted across the 17 positions we hold weights for in DISK and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 17 and 107.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in DISKWeight in QQQDifference
SNDKSandisk Corp/De16.84%0.88%15.96%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4.64%4.43%0.21%
STXSeagate Technology Holdings Plc4.28%0.83%3.45%
WDCWestern Digital Corp Company Guar 11/28 34.29%0.79%3.50%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of DISK and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

DISKQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DISK or QQQ?

DISK has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between DISK and QQQ?

At least 6.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings DISK also owns. Our book for DISK is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 17 positions we hold weights for in DISK and 102 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, DISK or QQQ?

DISK yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than DISK?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.