DLNV vs FJUL
FT Vest US Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November vs FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - July
Which is better, DLNV or FJUL?
DLNV has been ahead.
DLNV led over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DLNV | FJUL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Tie | 0.85%Tie |
| AUM | $20M | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 19 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +9.53%Best | +9.44% |
| 1Y Return | +11.42%Best | +10.72% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.15% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.4%Best | 7.2% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Nov 21, 2025 | Jul 16, 2020 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
DLNV vs FJUL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DLNV vs FJUL Performance
FT Vest US Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November (DLNV) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year DLNV returned +11.42% while FJUL returned +10.72%. Year to date, DLNV is up 9.53% versus a gain of 9.44% for FJUL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FJUL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 7.2% compared with 6.4% for DLNV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DLNV charges 0.85% per year while FJUL charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, DLNV currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for FJUL.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DLNV and FJUL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DLNV or FJUL?
DLNV has an expense ratio of 0.85% while FJUL charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, DLNV or FJUL?
Over the past year DLNV returned +11.42% vs +10.72% for FJUL, so DLNV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DLNV or FJUL?
FJUL has been the more volatile fund at 7.2% annualized versus 6.4% for DLNV.
Should I hold both DLNV and FJUL?
DLNV and FJUL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DLNV or FJUL?
DLNV yields 0.00% while FJUL yields 0.00%, so FJUL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FJUL better than DLNV?
DLNV led over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.