DLS vs IVV
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. DLS offers more diversification with 1,014 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DLS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.1B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.50% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 1,014 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +11.38% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.07% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.73% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.39% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -66.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2006 | May 15, 2000 |
DLS vs IVV Performance
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund (DLS) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DLS returned +18.07% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, DLS is up 11.38% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, DLS compounded at +18.73% per year against +22.19% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.39% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +3.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DLS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.0% for DLS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DLS charges 0.58% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DLS currently yields 3.50% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DLS and IVV share 0 holdings out of 1440 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DLS or IVV?
DLS has an expense ratio of 0.58% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DLS or IVV?
Over the past year DLS returned +18.07% vs +21.79% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), DLS annualized +3.99% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DLS or IVV?
DLS has been the more volatile fund at 17.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DLS -66.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DLS and IVV?
DLS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DLS and IVV?
DLS and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1440 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DLS or IVV?
DLS yields 3.50% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DLS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.