DMAR vs VTI
FT Vest US Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DMAR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $454M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.72% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.02% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.82% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.73% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 19, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
DMAR vs VTI Performance
FT Vest US Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DMAR returned +13.02% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, DMAR is up 8.72% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, DMAR compounded at +11.82% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.73% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs +8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 6.1% for DMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.8% for DMAR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DMAR charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DMAR currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
DMAR and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DMAR or VTI?
DMAR has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DMAR or VTI?
Over the past year DMAR returned +13.02% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), DMAR annualized +8.08% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DMAR or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 6.1% for DMAR. Worst drawdown: DMAR -9.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DMAR and VTI?
DMAR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between DMAR and VTI?
DMAR and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DMAR or VTI?
DMAR yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.