DMB vs IVV
BNY Mellon Municipal Bond Infrastructure Fund, Inc. vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DMB | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $289M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.51% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 200 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +0.21% | +13.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.42% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.82% | +22.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.98% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2013 | May 15, 2000 |
DMB vs IVV Performance
BNY Mellon Municipal Bond Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (DMB) is a ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DMB returned +11.42% while IVV returned +21.62%. Year to date, DMB is up 0.21% versus a gain of 13.22% for IVV.
Over three years, DMB compounded at +3.82% per year against +22.17% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -2.98% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.02% annualized vs -0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DMB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.1% for DMB and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Holdings Overlap
DMB and IVV share 0 holdings out of 625 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, DMB or IVV?
Over the past year DMB returned +11.42% vs +21.62% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), DMB annualized -0.81% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DMB or IVV?
DMB has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DMB -40.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DMB and IVV?
DMB and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DMB and IVV?
DMB and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 625 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DMB or IVV?
DMB yields 4.51% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DMB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.