DRSK vs IVV
Aptus Defined Risk ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DRSK | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.78% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.74% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 25 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +0.04% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.34% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.09% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.04% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Aptus Capital Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 7, 2018 | May 15, 2000 |
DRSK vs IVV Performance
Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) is a ETF from Aptus Capital Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DRSK returned -0.34% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, DRSK is up 0.04% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, DRSK compounded at +8.09% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +2.04% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +4.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.8% for DRSK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.9% for DRSK and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DRSK charges 0.78% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $3 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DRSK currently yields 3.74% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DRSK and IVV share 0 holdings out of 515 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DRSK or IVV?
DRSK has an expense ratio of 0.78% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DRSK or IVV?
Over the past year DRSK returned -0.34% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DRSK annualized +4.85% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DRSK or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.8% for DRSK. Worst drawdown: DRSK -19.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DRSK and IVV?
DRSK and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DRSK and IVV?
DRSK and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 515 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DRSK or IVV?
DRSK yields 3.74% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DRSK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.