DRV vs VTI
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3X ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DRV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.06% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $24M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.68% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -26.49% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | -24.74% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -23.71% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -14.21% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 49.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 16, 2009 | May 24, 2001 |
DRV vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3X ETF (DRV) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DRV returned -24.74% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, DRV is down 26.49% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, DRV compounded at -23.71% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -14.21% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs -42.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DRV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 49.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for DRV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DRV charges 1.06% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $106 vs $3 annually, a gap of $103 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DRV currently yields 3.68% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
DRV and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2785 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DRV or VTI?
DRV has an expense ratio of 1.06% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $103 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DRV or VTI?
Over the past year DRV returned -24.74% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), DRV annualized -42.73% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DRV or VTI?
DRV has been the more volatile fund at 49.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DRV -100.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DRV and VTI?
DRV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DRV and VTI?
DRV and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2785 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DRV or VTI?
DRV yields 3.68% while VTI yields 1.07%, so DRV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.