DSCO vs VTI
DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, DSCO or VTI?
Investment Grade Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DSCO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $182M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.71% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 355 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +0.20% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.83% |
| Fund Family | DoubleLine Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Investment Grade Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
DSCO vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DSCO vs VTI Performance
DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF (DSCO) is an ETF from DoubleLine Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, DSCO is up 0.20% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DSCO charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DSCO currently yields 2.71% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 55 holdings in DSCO and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 16.6% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 47 days apart, DSCO as of Sep 16, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 55 positions we hold weights for in DSCO and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 355 and 3,524.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DSCO and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DSCO or VTI?
DSCO has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, DSCO or VTI?
DSCO yields 2.71% while VTI yields 1.03%, so DSCO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than DSCO?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.