DSEP vs GJUN

DSEP vs GJUN

Which is better, DSEP or GJUN?

DSEP has been ahead.

DSEP led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: DSEP

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDSEPGJUN
Expense Ratio0.85%Tie0.85%Tie
AUM$383M$510M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1010
YTD Return+10.04%Best+7.10%
1Y Return+12.12%Best+9.23%
3Y Return (annualized)+12.77%Best+12.25%
5Y Return (annualized)+8.96%-
Volatility (annualized)6.3%5.9%Best
Max Drawdown-9.9%Best-11.0%
$10,000 over 3.3 years$14,578Best$14,174
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionSep 18, 2020Jun 16, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 20, 2023 to Oct 13, 2026 (3.3 years).

DSEP vs GJUN growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.

Compare DSEP against instead:DSEP vs SPYDSEP vs QQQDSEP vs VOODSEP vs VTIGJUN against:GJUN vs VXUS

DSEP vs GJUN Performance

FT Vest US Equity Deep Buffer ETF - September (DSEP) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year DSEP returned +12.12% while GJUN returned +9.23%. Year to date, DSEP is up 10.04% versus a gain of 7.10% for GJUN.

Over three years, DSEP compounded at +12.77% per year against +12.25% for GJUN.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

DSEP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.3% compared with 5.9% for GJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.9% for DSEP and -11.0% for GJUN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DSEP charges 0.85% per year while GJUN charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, DSEP currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for GJUN.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of DSEP and GJUN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

DSEPGJUN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DSEP or GJUN?

DSEP has an expense ratio of 0.85% while GJUN charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, DSEP or GJUN?

Over the past year DSEP returned +12.12% vs +9.23% for GJUN, so DSEP leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, DSEP or GJUN?

DSEP has been the more volatile fund at 6.3% annualized versus 5.9% for GJUN. Worst drawdown: DSEP -9.9% vs GJUN -11.0%.

Should I hold both DSEP and GJUN?

DSEP and GJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, DSEP or GJUN?

DSEP yields 0.00% while GJUN yields 0.00%, so GJUN currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is GJUN better than DSEP?

DSEP led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.