DUG vs IVV
ProShares UltraShort Energy vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DUG | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $19M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.55% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -52.17% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | -58.29% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -28.58% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -43.24% | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 47.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
DUG vs IVV Performance
ProShares UltraShort Energy (DUG) is a ETF from ProShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DUG returned -58.29% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, DUG is down 52.17% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, DUG compounded at -28.58% per year against +22.08% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -43.24% and +12.96% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs -31.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 47.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for DUG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DUG charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUG currently yields 4.55% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DUG and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DUG or IVV?
DUG has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DUG or IVV?
Over the past year DUG returned -58.29% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), DUG annualized -31.50% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DUG or IVV?
DUG has been the more volatile fund at 47.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DUG -100.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DUG and IVV?
DUG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DUG and IVV?
DUG and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DUG or IVV?
DUG yields 4.55% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DUG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.