DUKQ vs IVV
Ocean Park Domestic ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DUKQ or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 94.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DUKQ | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $13M | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.31% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 26 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +12.91% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.42% | +16.32%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.03% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $12,563 | $14,158Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 94.3% | 38.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Ocean Park Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 11, 2024 to Oct 2, 2026 (2.2 years).
DUKQ vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
DUKQ vs IVV Performance
Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) is an ETF from Ocean Park Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DUKQ returned +14.42% while IVV returned +16.32%. Year to date, DUKQ is up 12.91% versus a gain of 13.60% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DUKQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 11.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for DUKQ and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DUKQ charges 0.98% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $3 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUKQ currently yields 0.31% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 12 holdings in DUKQ and 505 in IVV, totalling 99.3% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 12 positions we hold weights for in DUKQ and 505 in IVV, against full books of 26 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 497 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DUKQ (99.3% of the fund), and 12 for DUKQ that do not appear in IVV (99.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DUKQ and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DUKQ or IVV?
DUKQ has an expense ratio of 0.98% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $95 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DUKQ or IVV?
Over the past year DUKQ returned +14.42% vs +16.32% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DUKQ annualized +10.93% vs +17.12% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DUKQ or IVV?
DUKQ has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 11.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DUKQ -18.4% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both DUKQ and IVV?
DUKQ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DUKQ or IVV?
DUKQ yields 0.31% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DUKQ?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 94.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.