DVXB vs VTI
WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DVXB delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DVXB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $143,377 | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.09% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.76% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | WEBs Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
DVXB vs VTI Performance
WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB) is a ETF from WEBs Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DVXB returned +25.76% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, DVXB is up 18.09% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DVXB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.8% for DVXB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.12. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DVXB charges 0.89% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DVXB currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
DVXB and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DVXB or VTI?
DVXB has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DVXB or VTI?
Over the past year DVXB returned +25.76% vs +21.39% for VTI, so DVXB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), DVXB annualized +18.37% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DVXB or VTI?
DVXB has been the more volatile fund at 28.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DVXB -19.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DVXB and VTI?
DVXB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.12, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DVXB and VTI?
DVXB and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DVXB or VTI?
DVXB yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.