DVXK vs IVV
WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DVXK delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DVXK | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.47% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +32.02% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +49.29% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | WEBs Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
DVXK vs IVV Performance
WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF (DVXK) is a ETF from WEBs Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DVXK returned +49.29% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, DVXK is up 32.02% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DVXK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.1% for DVXK and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DVXK charges 0.89% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DVXK currently yields 2.47% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DVXK and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DVXK or IVV?
DVXK has an expense ratio of 0.89% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DVXK or IVV?
Over the past year DVXK returned +49.29% vs +22.61% for IVV, so DVXK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), DVXK annualized +50.04% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DVXK or IVV?
DVXK has been the more volatile fund at 39.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DVXK -24.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DVXK and IVV?
DVXK and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DVXK and IVV?
DVXK and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DVXK or IVV?
DVXK yields 2.47% while IVV yields 1.09%, so DVXK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.