DWX vs IVV

DWX vs IVV
See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDWXIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.45%0.03%
AUM$530M$907.0B
Dividend Yield4.11%1.10%
Holdings122508
YTD Return+10.15%+12.96%
1Y Return+16.05%+20.70%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.87%+22.10%
5Y Return (annualized)+7.74%+13.40%
Volatility (annualized)20.0%15.1%
Max Drawdown-69.3%-56.5%
Fund FamilySPDR State Street Global AdvisorsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionFeb 12, 2008May 15, 2000

DWX vs IVV Performance

State Street SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DWX returned +16.05% while IVV returned +20.70%. Year to date, DWX is up 10.15% versus a gain of 12.96% for IVV.

Over three years, DWX compounded at +16.87% per year against +22.10% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.74% and +13.40% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.01% annualized vs -1.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

DWX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.3% for DWX and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DWX charges 0.45% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DWX currently yields 4.11% against 1.10% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

DWX and IVV share 0 holdings out of 606 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DWX or IVV?

DWX has an expense ratio of 0.45% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.

Which performed better, DWX or IVV?

Over the past year DWX returned +16.05% vs +20.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), DWX annualized -1.09% vs +7.01% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, DWX or IVV?

DWX has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DWX -69.3% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both DWX and IVV?

DWX and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between DWX and IVV?

DWX and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 606 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, DWX or IVV?

DWX yields 4.11% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DWX currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free