EAOM vs VYM
EAOM vs VYM
iShares ESG Aware 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EAOM | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $9M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.78% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +4.41% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.97% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.54% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.70% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 12, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
EAOM vs VYM Performance
iShares ESG Aware 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EAOM returned +8.97% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, EAOM is up 4.41% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, EAOM compounded at +9.54% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +3.70% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +5.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 8.8% for EAOM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.7% for EAOM and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EAOM charges 0.18% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $4 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EAOM currently yields 2.78% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
EAOM and VYM share 0 holdings out of 564 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EAOM or VYM?
EAOM has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $14 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EAOM or VYM?
Over the past year EAOM returned +8.97% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), EAOM annualized +5.54% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EAOM or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 8.8% for EAOM. Worst drawdown: EAOM -20.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both EAOM and VYM?
EAOM and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EAOM and VYM?
EAOM and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 564 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EAOM or VYM?
EAOM yields 2.78% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.