EAOM vs VYM
iShares ESG Aware 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, EAOM or VYM?
Debt-oriented balanced against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EAOM | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.89% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 7 | 613 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.8%Best | 13.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.7% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 6.1 years | $13,846 | $23,920Best |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Debt-oriented balanced | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 12, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 36 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. EAOM has data through Aug 12, 2026 and VYM through Sep 17, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 6.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 18, 2020 to Aug 12, 2026 (6.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.8% compared with 8.8% for EAOM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.7% for EAOM and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EAOM charges 0.18% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $4 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EAOM currently yields 2.89% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 6 holdings in EAOM and 557 in VYM, totalling 100.0% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 6 positions we hold weights for in EAOM and 557 in VYM, against full books of 7 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 528 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for EAOM (97.1% of the fund), and 6 for EAOM that do not appear in VYM (100.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EAOM and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EAOM or VYM?
EAOM has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, EAOM or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 13.8% annualized versus 8.8% for EAOM. Worst drawdown: EAOM -20.7% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both EAOM and VYM?
EAOM and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EAOM or VYM?
EAOM yields 2.89% while VYM yields 2.22%, so EAOM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than EAOM?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.