EAOR vs QQQ
iShares ESG Aware 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EAOR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $32M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.33% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +7.25% | +17.85% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.49% | +26.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.04% | +26.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.91% | +15.16% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.9% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 12, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
EAOR vs QQQ Performance
iShares ESG Aware 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (EAOR) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EAOR returned +13.49% while QQQ returned +26.45%. Year to date, EAOR is up 7.25% versus a gain of 17.85% for QQQ.
Over three years, EAOR compounded at +13.04% per year against +26.07% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +5.91% and +15.16% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.09% annualized vs +8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 10.8% for EAOR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.9% for EAOR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EAOR charges 0.18% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $18 annually. On income, EAOR currently yields 2.33% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
EAOR and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 109 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EAOR or QQQ?
EAOR has an expense ratio of 0.18% while QQQ charges 0.18%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EAOR or QQQ?
Over the past year EAOR returned +13.49% vs +26.45% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), EAOR annualized +8.61% vs +13.09% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EAOR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 10.8% for EAOR. Worst drawdown: EAOR -22.9% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both EAOR and QQQ?
EAOR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EAOR and QQQ?
EAOR and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 109 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EAOR or QQQ?
EAOR yields 2.33% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so EAOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.